Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12855 (UTT)

SADHNA AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1248/2024 · 2025-03-07

Alok Mahra, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1587-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1248 of 2024 Hon’ble G. Narendar, C.J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. No representation on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General for the State would submit that the counsel for the petitioners passed away yesterday, but he would submit that the instant writ petition should be disposed of in usual course, as he has instructed by the jurisdictional police to submit that there is no treat perception. 4. Be that as it may, in the event petitioners apprehend any danger to their life and limb, they shall immediately contact the S.H.O. Ramnagar, District Nainital and in such an event, the S.H.O. shall extend all possible assistance and protection. 5. In view of the above, writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mahra, J.) (G. Narendar, C.J.) 07.03.2025 07.03.2025 BS