Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16211 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2933 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohammad Firoj Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1. Heard Mr. Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed for following reliefs: "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 3 & 4 to carry out the fixation of salary of petitioners in terms of government order dated 26.08.1977 and G. O. dated 18.05.1983 contained as ANNEXURE No.3 & 4 to this writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay arrear of difference of salary after fixation along with appropriate interest. (iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that petitioner was initially working in Indian Army and subsequently, he has been appointed in Police Department of the State of U.P., therefore, in view of the settled legal position, the services rendered by the petitioner in Indian Army is to be counted for the purposes of fixation of his salary and other benefits. For the said grievances, he has made representations before the authority concerned but no decision has been taken thereon till date. Hence the present writ petition. 4. Considering the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of providing that the petitioner may move a fresh representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as he may be advised, before respondent no.4, within two weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.4 shall consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned speaking order, preferably within three months thereafter, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench