APHC010373972025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19237/2025 Between: 1. PICHIKALA PRASAD, S/O.VENKATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.1-22, MAIN ROAD, POTHAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE ASSISTANT PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS AND PROJECTS, DOWALAISWARAM, RAJAHMUNDRY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the admitted/finalized bills payable to the petitioner towards the completed 7 Works of construction of CC roads in various villages of Nallajerla Mandal, under M-Book Pass Orders I.e., l.M.Book No. 689/A/2022- 23, Rs.1,16,566/-, 2. M.Book No. 702/A/2022-23, Rs.77,715/-, 3. M.Book No. 705/A/2022-23, Rs.3,17,904/-, 4.M.Book No. 687/A/2022-23, Rs.3,87,077/-, 5. M.Book No. 706/A/2022-23, Rs.2,35,747/-, 6. M.Book No 704/A/2022-23, Rs. 1,94,283/-, 7. M.Book No. 701/A/2022-23 Rs.2,57,953/-, all together in total Rs. 15,87,245/ , under GGMP Funds, even after finalizing the bills as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also oppose to the settled principles of law, and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith release the due amount to the petitioner pending under M-Book Pass Orders I.e., l.M.Book No. 689/A/2022-23, Rs.1,16,566/-, 2. M.Book No. 702/A/2022-23, Rs.77,715/-, 3. M.Book No. 705/A/2022-23 Rs.3,17,904/-, 4.M.Book No. 687/A/2022-23, Rs.3,87,077/-, 5. M.Book No. 706/A/2022-23, Rs.2,35,747/-, 6. M.Book No 704/A/2022-23, Rs. 1,94,283/-, 7. M.Book No. 701/A/2022-23 Rs.2,57,953/-, all together in total Rs. 15,87,245/-, under GGMP Funds, and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondent Nos; 1 to 3 to release the amount pending under M-Book Pass Orders I.e., l.M.Book No. 689/A/2022-23, Rs.1,16,566/-, 2. M.Book No. 702/A/2022-23, 705/A/2022-23, Rs.77,715/-, 3. M.Book No. Rs.3,17,904/-, 4.M.Rnnk No. 687/A/2022-23, Rs.3,87,077/-, 5. M.Book No. 706/A/2022-23, Rs.2,35,747/-, 6. M.Book No: 704/A/2022-23, Rs. 1,94,283/-, 7. M.Book No. 701/A/2022-23 Rs.2,57,953/-, all together in total Rs. 15,87,245/-, under GGMP Funds, to the petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVULA NAGARJUNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORDER Heard Sri Ravula Nagarjuna, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P.Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development & Finance and Planning Department, for the respondents. 2. The above writ petition was filed to declare the action of the respondents in not releasing the admitted/finalized bills payable to the petitioner towards the completed 7 Works of construction of CC roads in various villages of Nallajerla Mandal, under M-Book Pass Orders i.e., l.M.Book No.689/A/2022-23, Rs.1,16,566/-, 2. M.Book No.702/A/2022-23, Rs.77,715/-, 3. M.Book No.705/A/2022-23, Rs.3,17,904/-, 4.M.Book No.687/A/2022-23, Rs.3,87,077/-, 5. M.Book No.706/A/2022-23, Rs.2,35,747/- 6. M.Book No.704/A/2022-23, Rs.1,94,283/-, 7. M.Book No.701/A/2022-23 Rs.2,57,953/-, all together in total Rs.15,87,245/-, under GGMP Funds, even after finalizing the bills, as illegal and arbitrary. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, submitted the written instructions of 4th respondent-Executive Engineer, PR PIU Division, Bhimavaram. 4. A perusal of the said instructions would disclose that the total value of the work done by the petitioner comes to Rs.18,54,952/- [Rs.15,87,245/- (TVWD) + Rs.2,67,707/- (GST)] and the net amount payable to the petitioner after statutory deductions of Rs.1,62,064/- comes to Rs.16,92,888/-. The written instructions are made as part of the record. 5. Thus, as seen from the instructions there is no dispute regarding the execution of works and the petitioner’s entitlement for Rs.16,92,888/-. Since the amount payable is admitted and undisputed, the writ petition is maintainable. In M/s Utkal Highways Engineers and Contractors v. Chief General Manager & Ors1, it was held at Para No.8 as under: “Be that as it may, the High court has not dealt with the merits of the writ petition. Moreover, it is not an inviolable rule that no money claim can be adjudicated upon in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Non-payment of admitted dues, inter alia, may be considered an arbitrary action on the part of respondents and for claiming the same, a writ petition may lie.Further, throwing a writ petition on ground of availability of alternative remedy after 10 years, particularly, when parties have exchanged their affidavits, is not the correct course unless there are disputed questions of fact which by their very nature cannot be adjudicated upon without recording formal evidence.”. 6. Given the instructions furnished by the 4th respondent, though there is a small variation in the amount claimed by the petitioner and the amount determined by the official, as payable to the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to release an amount of Rs.16,92,888/- (Rupees Sixteen Lakhs Ninety Two Thousand Eight Hundred and Eighty Eight only) payable to the petitioner regarding execution of the aforementioned work, within three (03) months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD 1 2025 SCC online SC 1400