1 APHC010152412020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9386/2020 Between: 1. B. ANADAYYA, S/O. LATE BAASA DORA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. DEGUVA KANTHALACHERUVU VILLAGE, DEGUVA PATHA PALEM POST, PARADARAMI YADAMARI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YADAMARI POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DISTINCT SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 7. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 8. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VELLORE DISTRICT, VELLORE, TAMILNADU STATE. 9. THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER, GUDIYATHAM RANGE, VELLORE DISTRIST, TAMILNADU STATE. 10. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, VELLORE DIVISION, VELLORE, TAMILNADU STATE. 11. M/S GANAPATHI GRANITES, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR M PRATAP REDDY S/O BHASKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O THANA YELHUNA RAJUPALLI POST G D NELLORE, MANDALAM CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners land an extent of Ac. 50.10 acres in Survey No. 42 of Kanthalacheruvu, Yadamari Mandal, Chittoor District is as illegal, arbitrary highhanded and without jurisdiction and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the land an Ac. 50.10 acres in Survey No. 42 of Kanthalacheruvu, Yadamari mandal, Chittoor District belonging to the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the land of the petitioner an extent of Ac. 50.10 acres in Survey No. 42 of Kanthalacheruvu, Yadamari mandal, Chittoor District pending writ petition in this Hon’ble court and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2020 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders passed by this Hon’ble court in WP. 9386/2020 dated 29-05-2020 until further orders in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9386/2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners land an extent of Ac. 50.10 acres in Survey No. 42 of Kanthalacheruvu, Yadamari Mandal, Chittoor District is as illegal, arbitrary highhanded and without jurisdiction and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the land an Ac. 50.10 acres in Survey No. 42 of Kanthalacheruvu, Yadamari mandal, Chittoor District belonging to the petitioner and pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the respondent- police are not interfering in the matter in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.08.2025 UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.9386 of 2020 Dated.05.08.2025 UPS 75