Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 128427 (ALL)

DILIP KAUSHAL AND ANOTHER v. NAYAB TEHSILDAR, NAGAR, TEHSIL SADAR, DISTT. AYODHYA AND 2 OTHERS

A227/1401/2025 · 2025-03-18

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15756 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1401 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dilip Kaushal And Another Respondent :- Nayab Tehsildar, Nagar, Tehsil Sadar, Distt. Ayodhya And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganga Prasad Mishra,Abhinav Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief:- "i) Direct the opp. party no.1 Nayab Tehsildar Nagar Tehsil-Sadar, District Ayodhya to decide the case no.13681/2024 Computerized case no.T202404230113681 (Dilip Kaushal Versus Prem Kumar) Under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 Situated Village- Ranopali (B.N.P) Pargana Haveli Awadh tehsil Sadar district Ayodhya. Fixed on 11-03-2025 pending in his Court expeditiously within stipulated time granted by this Hon'ble court to meet the end of justice. As contained in Annexure no. 1 to this petition." Taking note of Section 24(3) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 read with U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, as per which, the demarcation proceedings, being summary in nature, should preferably be decided within a period of three months, however, in the instant case, the application for demarcation has not been decided till date, which is pending since October 2024 and on account of pendency of the same, petitioners are suffering great hardship and mental agony, this Court is of the view that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the present petition pending. In view of above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the Case No.T202404230113681 (Dilip Kaushal Versus Prem Kumar) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Arun/Anand/- Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench