Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12842 (RAJ)

MOHAMMAD SATAAR S/O MOHAMMAD MUNSHI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4224/2025 · 2025-05-23

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21884] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4224/2025 1. Mohammad Sataar S/o Mohammad Munshi, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Ward No. 16, Mandawa, Police Station Mandawa District Jhunjhunu. (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). 2. Anwar Ali S/o Mohammad Munshi, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Ward No. 16, Mandawa, Police Station Mandawa District Jhunjhunu. (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. O.P. Jhajhria with Mr. Arun Singh Shekhawat, Ms. Karishma Rathore and Mr. Hemant Runthla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 23/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.6/2025 registered at Police Station- Mandawa, District-Jhunjhhunu for the offences under Sections 79, 109(1), 115(2), 189(2), 190, 333, 351(3) and 352 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel [2025:RJ-JP:21884] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4224/2025] further submits that the names of the petitioners have not been mentioned in the FIR. The injury dangerous to life was attributed to co-accused-Anish. Co-accused-Abdul Majeed, Amir and Mohammad Juber have been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court on 18.03.2025. There is no specific allegation against the present petitioners. Petitioners are behind the bars since 23.01.2025. Therefore, on the ground of parity, the petitioners may be released on bail. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Mohammad Sataar S/o Mohammad Munshi and Anwar Ali S/o Mohammad Munshi shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each of them to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/396