MOHD. AFSAR BEG v. RADHA KRISHAN DHIMAN DIRECTOR SANJAY GANDHI P.G. INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, LKO.
CAPL/1320/2024 · 2025-07-11
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128410 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128410 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39644 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1320 of 2024 Applicant :- Mohd. Afsar Beg Opposite Party :- Radha Krishan Dhiman Director Sanjay Gandhi P.G. Institute Of Medical Science, Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Shubham Tripathi Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Standing Counsel.
2. This application under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the
judgment and order dated 14.07.2023 passed in bunch of petitions, leading case bearing number Writ-A No. 902 of
2011.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was appointed as Assistant Accountant/Computer Operator in the year 1990 in the pay scale of Rs.860/-. Thereafter, in the year 1998, Accounts cadre was reorganized and the post of Accountant became at par with the AIIMS and benefits for the said post were given to the persons working in the Accounts department in SGPGI. It is further submitted that the benefits to the members of Accounts cadre was also extended with the State Government in the year 1997-98. Thereafter, controversy came up before this Court in several petitions including the petition filed by the applicant. Thereafter, all these petitions were disposed of by setting aside the seniority list dated 27.06.2014 with the direction to prepare fresh seniority list of Accounts cadre in accordance with law and observations made in the
judgment, as also the decisions of the President dated 15.01.2010, Governing Body dated 06.03.2010, the Director dated 11.10.2010 and the Visitor dated 15.01.2011 within two months from the date of the order. It is also submitted that the directions issued by the writ
court has not been complied with and the seniority list was issued on 24.05.2024, in which, the persons, those were getting lower salary to the applicant, are placed above him. It is, thus, submitted that the respondent may be summoned and punished accordingly.
4. Shri Shubham Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, while referring to the affidavit of compliance, vehemently opposes the prayer of the applicant and submits that after reorganization of the Accounts cadre in the SGPGI, the seniority list has been prepared for the post of Assistant Accountant on the basis of the date of joining and there is no illegality in the seniority list. It is, therefore, submitted that the order of writ Court has been complied with in letter and spirit.
5. Considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel appearing for the respondent and going through the order of writ Court and the contents of the affidavit of compliance, this Court is of the view that the order of writ court has been complied with and no contempt is made out.
6. The contempt application, accordingly, stands dismissed.
7. However, it is always open to the applicant to ventilate his grievance, if any, before the appropriate forum.
Order Date :- 11.7.2025 VKS Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench