Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No.369 of 2025 in
CWP No.569 of 2025
Decided on: 21.05.2025
Anil Kumar
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
… Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Mr. M.A. Safee, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional
Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents submits that appropriate orders in terms of the
judgment in issue shall positively be passed by the Authority concerned within a period of two weeks from today. His statement is taken on record.
3.
These proceedings are accordingly closed, with liberty to the petitioner to seek the revival thereof, if the needful is not done within a period of three weeks from today by the Authority concerned. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand
disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge May 21, 2025 (Vinod)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?