CRL.OP(MD) NO.5311 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL. O.P(MD) No.5311 of 2025 Sunitha ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Inspector of Police, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.688 of 2023) 2.Venkatesh ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 to call for the records pertaining to the Charge Sheet in C.C.No.752 of 2024 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai and quash the same as illegal. For petitioner : Mr.M.Aladheen For R1 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.Sundara Raj _____________ Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP(MD) NO.5311 of 2025 ***** O R D E R This petition has been filed by the petitioner to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.752 of 2024 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai for the offences under Section 381 of IPC, in Crime No.688 of 2023 and quash the same. 2. According to the petitioner, due to the money dispute, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint against the petitioner. Based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, the police has registered FIR in Cr.No. 688 of 2023 for the offences under Section 381 of IPC. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel on both sides represented that during pendency of the case in C.C.No.752 of 2024, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court. 4. Today, the defacto-complainant and the accused are present and _____________ Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP(MD) NO.5311 of 2025 the Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defacto- complainant represented that they entered into a compromise and he has no objection in allowing this petition. A compromise memo, dated 19.03.2025 signed by the parties and their respective counsels, is also filed before this Court. 5. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo. 6. Considering the nature of the offences and the parties have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition. 7. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and C.C.No.752 of 2024 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, is quashed as against this petitioner. 03.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd _____________ Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP(MD) NO.5311 of 2025 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, 2.The Inspector of Police, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. _____________ Page No. 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP(MD) NO.5311 of 2025 P.DHANABAL,J apd Crl.OP(MD) No.5311 of 2025 03.04.2025 _____________ Page No. 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis