- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10647-DB MFA No. 1040 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1040 OF 2021 (SFC) BETWEEN: 1. M/S. ANJANEYA OIL INDUSTRIES REGD. PARTNERSHIP FIRM C/O G. ASHWATHANARAYANA SHETTY R/AT OPP UNION PARK CHITRADURGA REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS 1(A). SRI. G. ASHWATHNARAYANA SHETTY S/O LATE ADAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, R/O UNION PARK, CHITRADURGA TOWN, OLD POST OFFICE ROAD, CHITRADURGA TOWN-577 501. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SUDHAKAR.B, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION BEHIND BASAVESHWARA TAKIES CHITRADURGA-577 501 BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER 2. SRI. G. ASHOK KUMAR S/O ASHWATHNARAYANA SHETTY, Digitally signed by HARIKRISHNA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10647-DB MFA No. 1040 of 2021 AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O OPP. UNION PARK, CHITRADURGA TOWN, OLD POST OFFICE ROAD, CHITRADURGA TOWN-577 501. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.S. ARUNA, HCGP FOR R2, R1-SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 32(9) OF THE STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION ACT, 1951 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29.01.2015 PASSED IN CIVIL MISC.NO.16/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHITRADURGA, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 31(a)(aa) OF SFC ACT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Heard learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials on record. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that the order appealed against has already been submitted to a challenge in writ petition No.10162/2015. The said writ petition is disposed of vide judgment dated 24.11.2020. Though it was found by the learned Single Judge that the writ - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10647-DB MFA No. 1040 of 2021 petitioner has not made out a case to interfere with the orders at Annexure-F and G dated 12.05.2024 and 29.01.2015 respectively. 3. The above view of the matter, we are of the considered view that nothing survives for consideration. The appeal fails and the same is accordingly dismissed. 4. All other contentions are left open. 5. In view of dismissal of the main appeal, all the pending applications stand disposed of. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE KTY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11