Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 128392 (ALL)

SHRINIVAS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/2842/2025 · 2025-03-12

Alok Mathur

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15212 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2842 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shrinivas Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rachit Sondhi,Shilendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The grievance of the petitioner, who has retired as Sub Inspector after attaining the age of superannuation on 31.12.2021, is that he is getting less pension to the similarly situated persons, who are getting higher pension and accordingly he has made several representations in this regard none of which has been considered. 3. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall stand substantially redressed in case his representation in this regard is considered and decided, expeditiously. 4. Learned State counsel does not object to the prayer made by the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, without entering into merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 i.e. Uttar Pradesh Police Finance Controller/C.A.O., Police Headquarter, Lucknow to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 11.2.2025, as contained in Annexure No.7 to the writ petition, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioner. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date: 12.3.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench