Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12839 (UTT)

RAJVIR SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

SPA/348/2024 · 2025-07-31

Ashish Naithani, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6748-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHISH NAITHANI 31st JULY, 2025 SPECIAL APPEAL No. 348 OF 2024 Rajvir Singh …..Appellant. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents Counsel for the appellant. : Mr. B.M. Pingal, learned counsel for the appellant. Counsel for the respondents : Mr. P.C. Bisht, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel with Mr. S.M.S. Mehta, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. JUDGMENT : (per Sri G. Narendar, C.J.) So far as the above Special Appeal is concerned, it is seen that the basis for termination of the appellant-writ petitioner’s service is the communication dated 17th August, 2016 issued by the Registrar, Education Regulatory Authority, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad, wherein it is stated that Enrolment No. 828 of L.T. Examination, 1999 from Sakaldiha Training College, Sakaldiha, Varanasi does not belong to the petitioner, rather it belongs to one Rajvir Singh, son of Sri Padadhar Singh. In the absence of challenge to this foundational fact, we are unable to comprehend as to how any relief can be granted to a consequential order of removal, which admittedly, is premised on the opinion of the University. 2025:UHC:6748-DB 2 2. It is also not in dispute that the letter dated 29.10.2020 was issued pursuant to an inquiry conducted by the SIT constituted for unearthing such unjustified / illegal appointments. 3. In that view, learned counsel for the appellant prays leave to withdraw the instant Special Appeal with liberty to file fresh petition calling in question the letter of the Registrar, Education Regulatory Authority, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad dated 17.08.2016. 4. Reserving such liberty, the instant Special Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. Pending application, if any, also stands dismissed. _______________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. _________________ ASHISH NAITHANI, J. Dt: 31st July, 2025 Rathour PRAVIND RA SINGH RATHOUR Digitally signed by PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=23699ccc2fd40ad81b6fd133237 79d9e3aeb1097d17dbb53d481cabd2594 6eed, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=1F65499E931DF71CDAF92 A40CC6179B8E010331BA695239171F906 FD5C45C4E8, cn=PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Date: 2025.08.04 13:41:15 +05'30'