IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No.910 of 2025 Decided on: 2nd May, 2025 __________________________________________________________ Ms. Damini ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioner: Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge (Oral) After hearing Learned Senior Counsel for some time and keeping in view the Status Report and bank statements produced before this Court, prima facie accusation against the present bail petitioner is made out. Moreover, the accusation in the instant case originates and leads to an offence involving commercial quantity of contraband. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - Nothing has been placed on record before this Court to show that the bail petitioner is not guilty of the accusation as pre-mandated under Section 37(1)(b) of NDPS Act. 2. Faced with this situation, Learned Senior Counsel prays for withdrawing the instant bail petition. 3. Prayer not opposed by Learned State Counsel. 4. Accordingly, the instant bail petition is permitted to be withdrawn and is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge May 02, 2025 (Chiranjeev)