MANISHA SUBHASH ANDHALE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
APPLN/1010/2025 · 2025-04-28
Shri Arun R Pedneker
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12838 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12838 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 16 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 342 OF 2025 Chandrakala Kalyan Kawade And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. N. S. Ghanekar, O. M. Joshi, A. R. Devakate, S. P. Katneshwarkar, S. R. Andhale APP for Respondents-State: Mr. B. B. Bhise ... WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 831 OF 2025 IN ABA/342/2025
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 849 OF 2025 IN ABA/342/2025
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 887 OF 2025 IN ABA/342/2025
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 893 OF 2025 IN ABA/342/2025
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 916 OF 2025 IN ABA/342/2025
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1010 OF 2025 IN ABA/342/2025
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1207 OF 2025 IN ABA/342/2025
….
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : April 28, 2025.
PER COURT :-
1. At the outset, the learned Counsel for the applicant in Criminal Application No.1010/2025 in ABA/342/2025 seeks leave to withdraw the application. Accordingly, the said application is dismissed as withdrawn. Page
1 of
2
16 ABA 342-2025
2. From the record, it appears that the applicants had induced the informant to invest in their share trading company named ‘Asitek Solutions Company’, assuring returns at the rate of 8% per month initially, and subsequently 12% per month on the investments made. Prima facie, such returns are unrealistic and impossible.
3. The applicants shall demonstrate the amounts invested by the investors in ‘Asitek Solutions Company’ and the amounts, if any, returned to them.
4. List the matter on 05/05/2025.
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) vj gawade/-. Page
2 of
2