PANKAJ SHARMA v. G B PANT UNIVRSIT OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY PANTNAGAR
WPMS/3118/2022 · 2025-06-13
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12837 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12837 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPMS No. 3118 of 2022 WPMS No. 2896 of 2022
Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Tarun Prakash Singh Takuli, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Ms. Ananya Jain, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for the petitioner in the connected writ petition.
3. Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, learned counsel for the respondents.
4. The petitioners are praying for the following reliefs in both the writ petitions:
“i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
certiorari quashing the impugned
order no.
REG/DC/DIC/SR.A.O./2022/907 dated 21.10.2022
passed by respondent no. 1 by which the petitioner
has been debarred for two semesters i.e. I and II
semesters of academic year 2021-22 for using unfair
means during semester final examination of II
semester of Second Year course of B.Tech. (Industrial
and Production Engineer). (Annexure no. 1 to this
petition).
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
mandamus directing the respondents to impose the
penalty as previously in similar situation the
university was pleased to relax the said punishment
by giving him an alternative punishment of Rs.
25,000/- and giving him a chance of reform not
creating any question mark or blot in the academic
career by imposing a monetary penalty and saving
the academic career, else the petitioner shall suffer
irreparable loss and injury and the same cannot be
compensated by any means.”
5. The subject matter of both the matters are identical.
6.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue as raised in both the writ petitions are squarely covered by the judgment rendered by the Coordinate Bench in WPMS No. 1612 of 2023 and
WPMS No. 1650 of 2023 decided on 02.11.2023.
7.
Learned counsel for the respondents Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, who appears for the University, also fairly submits that the issue as raised in these petitions are squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench.
8. In view of the submissions as advanced by both the counsels, the present writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered by the Coordinate Bench dated 02.11.2023 passed in Writ Petition No. 1612 of 2023 ‘Dipesh Phulera vs. G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar, and Others’ and WPMS No. 1650 of 2023 ‘Himanshu Raj vs. G.B. Pant University and Others’.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 13.06.2025 PR