[2025:RJ-JP:27927] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1711/2025 Kunal Sharma S/o Shri Sanjeev Sharma, R/o A-319, Shyam Sarovar, Nh-11, Dausa (Raj). Presently Tenant Of Plot No. 52, Golimar Garden, Behind Sahkar Bhawan, 22 Godam, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Govt. Hotel, M.i. Road, Jaipur. 4. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur ( South). 5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Jyoti Nagar, District Jaipur City (South). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashwini Chaubey, Ms. Anushree Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 25/07/2025 1. The present criminal misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing the FIR No.278/2022 dated 28.09.2022, registered at Police Station Jyoti Nagar, District Jaipur City (South), for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 356, 384 and 143 of IPC for seeking direction to transfer the FIR to other police station for investigation. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner submitted a written detailed representation before the Director General of Police i.e. annexed as (Annexure-2) and [2025:RJ-JP:27927] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1711/2025] Director General of Police directed the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter on the points referred by the petitioner in his representation. It is also contended that the concerned Investigating Officer is not investigating the matter as per the directions given by the Director General of Police, therefore, the matter may be transferred to some other police station for investigation. 3. Heard and perused the material available on record. 4. The petitioner has already been given audience by the Director General of Police. The Director General of Police in furtherance of representation submitted by the petitioner has already given directions to the concerned Investigating Officer. If the petitioner has any grievance against the Investigating Officer regarding non-compliance of direction given by the Director General of Police, then also the petitioner is free to approach the Director General of Police for the redressal of his grievance. Further, if the petitioner has apprehension that the concerned Investigating Officer shall not proceed fairly then also the petitioner has right to submit the protest petition before the Trial Court, if the situation so arises. 5. Therefore, considering the above facts, this criminal miscellaneous petition is devoid of any merits and is hereby dismissed. 6. All pending applications, if any, shall also stands disposed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/25