Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12835 (CHH)

Uzma Akhatar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

WPS/3280/2017 · 2025-04-21

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:18024 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3280 of 2017 • Uzma Akhatar D/o Late Shri Mohammad Yusuf Aged About 38 Years R/o Bismil Chowk, Karbla Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Secretary School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. The Director Lok Sikshan Sanchanalay Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Collector Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5. The Secretary Chhattisgarh State Urdu Academy 7/ 381 Fazal Complex, Baijnathpara, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6. District Education Officer Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 7. Block Education Officer Kota, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 8. Lalita Pradhan Princial Of Government Urdu Primary School Karaiyapara, Ratanpur Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None appeared even in two rounds For Respondents 1 to 4, 6 & 7 For Respondent No. 5 : : Mr. Prateek Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 21/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records from the department and attendance register of Government Urdu Primary School, Karhaiyapara, Ratanpur, Bilaspur. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set- aside/quash the order dated 27.06.2015 (ANNEXURE P-1) and order dated 08.07.2016 (ANNEXURE P-2) passed by the respondent no. 6 which relates to petitioner. 10.3 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to given direction to the department Directorate of Public Education as well as Office of District Education, Bilaspur to release her salary which was upheld by the department till today. 10.4 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 8 to give permission to petitioner to sign on daily attendance register. 10.5 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to dfirect the respondent authorities to decide the pending matters against her as soon as possible.” 2. The petitioner has challenged Annexure P-1, whereby an order of recovery of excess advance payment made to the petitioner to the tune of Rs.3,18,000/- was passed by the District Education Officer, Bilaspur on 27.06.2015. 3. It appears that no interim order was passed and the amount would have been recovered from account of the petitioner and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even in two rounds too. 4. Consequently, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti