Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010108582025 2025:GAU-AS:6620 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./187/2025 ASIF ALI MIR SON OF LATE MIR AKRAM ALI R/O HOUSE NO. 23, BIRUBARI MASJID ROAD, BIRUBARI P.O. GOPINATH NAGAR, P.S. PLANTANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-781016, DIST. KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM, PH.NO. 8876338676 VERSUS SMTI ANJITA BAISHYA ALIAS ANJUMAN MIR AND ANR D/O SRI DHARMESWAR BAISHYA R/O DR.J.C. DAS ROAD, OPPOSITE NAMGHAR, PANBAZAR, PIN-781001, DIST. KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM, NOW RESIDING AT C/O SRI MITRA BHANU DAS FLAT NO. 3A/A-19(1ST FLOOR), REGENT PARADISE BHETA PARA, GUWAHATI-781028, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2:SRI PRATIM KUMAR BORA PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT NO. 1 KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI ULUBARI GUWAHATI-781007 NEAR DGP OFFICE Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M DEV, MS P DEB,MS N DEB Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 26.05.2025 1. Heard Ms. M. Dev, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This application has been filed under Section 438 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, challenging the propriety of the order dated 09.04.2025, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court No.1, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahati. 3. The petitioner has been paying maintenance to the respondent No.1. The petitioner wanted to deposit the maintenance in the bank account of the respondent No.1. Therefore he wanted the bank account details of the respondent No.1. 4. The respondent No.1, on the other hand, submitted that she will collect the maintenance from the Court itself. 5. According to her, the petitioner should come to the Court on the fixed date, he should pay the maintenance and she will collect it collect it from the Court. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it will be convenient for the petitioner if he allowed to deposit the maintenance in the bank account of the respondent No.1. 7. I have considered the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Page No.# 3/3 8. This Court is of the opinion that for disposal of this Criminal Revision Petition, the respondent No.1 need not be heard because no prejudice should be caused to the respondent No.1, if the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. 9. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. 10. The respondent No.1 shall provide her bank account details to the present petitioner and the petitioner shall deposit the maintenance in her bank account every month. 11. With the aforesaid direction the Criminal Revision Petitioner is disposed of in motion stage itself. JUDGE Comparing Assistant