Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16287 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3012 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dhananjay Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhijeet Mishra,Sharad Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing counsel for respondent no. 1 to 4. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents No. 2, 3 and 4 by suitably amend the pension payment order (PPO) of the petitioner by making suitable correction in the same at item no. 7 by treating the initial date of appointment as 05.06.1986 in place of 06.11.2003. Further the respondents may be directed to correct the item no. 10 & 13 of the part 3 of the PPO by mentioning the correct length of service of the petitioner as 38 years, 04 months and 26 days in place of 20 years, 11 months and 25 days. Further the respondents may be directed to correct the item no. 14 of the pension payment order (PPO) in place of level 5, the respondents may be directed to mention level 8 and at item no. 15 mentioned last salary drawn Rs.48,200, amount Rs. 74,300+ DA may be directed to be mentioned. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this petition has already been considered in the judgment and order dated 22.04.2024, passed in Writ A No. 1367 of 2022, "Deependra Prakash Tiwari vs. State of U.P. and others", and therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the respondents be directed to decide the petitioner’s claim in light of the said judgment and order within a specified time- frame. To the said prayer, learned Standing Counsel has no objection. Accordingly, keeping in view the aforesaid fact, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority who is said to be the District Magistrate, Amethi i.e. respondent no.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner which would be raised by the petitioner by filing a detailed representation within a period of two weeks from today. In case such a representation is filed within the time specified then the respondent no.3 shall proceed to consider the same keeping in view the judgment of this Court passed in the case of Deependra Prakash Tiwari (supra) within a further period of six weeks from the date of filing of the representation along with certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench