Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Manipur · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1283 (MAN)

SMT. R.K. NANAO DEVI v. NAMOIJAM KHEDAVARTA SINGH AND 3 OTHERS

CONT CAS(C)/65/2023 · 2025-06-04

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL Cont.Cas(C)No.65 of 2023 Smt. RK Nanao Devi Petitioner Vs. Namoijam Khedavarta Singh & 3 Ors. Respondents BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. KEMPAIAH SOMASHEKAR (O R D E R) 05.06.2025. This contempt petition has been initiated by the complainant for the willful disobedience of the order rendered by the learned Single Judge on the writ side in WP(C)No.362 of 2021 dated 21.02.2023 which is annexed as C/1. Learned counsel for the complainant namely, Ms. Waikom Geetarani, Mr. Lungmi Ragui, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and also for respondent No.4 namely, Mr. L. Raju are also present before the court physically. However, learned senior counsel for respondent Nos. 2 & 3 namely, Mr. CH. Ngongo is present before the court through video conferencing. Whereas, the learned counsel for the respondent No.4 in this matter is facilitating the order rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India JOHN TELEN KOM Digitally signed by JOHN TELEN KOM Date: 2025.06.12 10:32:31 +05'30' 2 in the proceeding of Petition for Special Leave to Appeal(C)No.10737 of 2025 and wherein in para 6, it is indicating that the Special Leave Petition is disposed of in above terms and the pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whereas the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 in this matter submitting that and also seeking for closing of the contempt petition keeping in view the aforesaid order rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 28.04.2025 rendered in Special Leave to Appeal(C)No.10737 of 2025. However, the learned counsel for the complainant in this matter also submitting that this contempt proceeding may be closed. Therefore, keeping in view the submission made by the learned counsel for the complainant as wells as the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent, it is deemed appropriate to pass some suitable order that this contempt petition does not survive for consideration. Consequently, this contempt petition is hereby closed. CHIEF JUSTICE John Kom