1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 340 of 2023 1. Deshraj Prasad, aged about 65 years, S/o late Ganaury Prasad, R/o & P.O. – Sarbahadi, P.S. – Manpur, District – Nalanda (Bihar), at present residing at Argora Basti, Pundag Road, P.O. – Argora, P.S. – Argora, District – Ranchi. 2. Dhananjay Prakash Verma, aged about 64 years, S/o late Ram Chandra Prakash Verma, R/o Boddom Bazar, near Bihari Girls High School, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. & District – Hazaribagh, at present residing at Argora Basti, Pundag Road, P.O. – Argora, P.S. – Argora, District – Ranchi. … … Petitioners Versus 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. The Jharkhand State Forest Development Corporation Ltd. Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. & District – Ranchi. 3. Mr. Nand Kishore Singh, father’s name not known to the petitioners presently posted as the Chief Conservator of Forest-cum-Managing Director, Jharkhand State Forest Development Corporation Ltd. Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. & District – Ranchi. 4. Mr. Arun Kumar Mishra, father’s name not known to the petitioners presently posted as the Incharge General Manager, Minor Forest Produce Project, Ranchi Circle, Ranchi 128/C, Road No. 2 Ashok Nagar, Ranchi P.O. – Ashoke Nagar, P.S. – Argora, District – Ranchi. 5. Mr. Arun Kumar Mishra, father’s name not known to the petitioners presently posted as the Divisional Manager, Minor Forest Produce Project, Ranchi Division, Ranchi, 48/C, Road No. 1, Ashok Nagar, Ranchi, P.O. – Ashok Nagar, P.S. – Argora, District – Ranchi. 6. Mr. Anil Kumar Prasad, father’s name not known to the petitioners presently posted as Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest- cum-Managing Director, Bihar, Office Flat K/5 & K/6, New Punaichak, Patna, P.O. & P.S. & District – Patna, Bihar. … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM :HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. N. PATHAK --- For the Petitioner : Ms. Chaitali C. Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Diwakar Upadhyay, Advocate : Mr. Rupesh Singh, Advocate --- 08/10th January 2025 1. Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties submits that the order of this Court has already been complied. 2. In view of the fair submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties. Hence, 2 the same is hereby dropped however, liberty is reserved with the petitioner to challenge afresh, if aggrieved. 3. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. (Dr. S. N. Pathak, J.) Aditi