Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15497 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2370 of 2025 Applicant :- Monu @ Juber Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Julfikar Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./Section 528 Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (in short "BNSS") has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and personal bond in all five cases in which he was roped only one arrest and applicant has been granted bail in all cases by the competent courts. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in five cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the competent courts. He says that the applicant is a very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant at District- Ayodhya are as follows:- (i) Case Crime No.0101 of 2023, under Section 307 I.P.C., Police Station -Haidarganj, District -Ayodhya. (ii) Case Crime No.0232 of 2020, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Khandasa, District -Ayodhya. (iii) Case Crime No.65 of 2019, under Section 60 of Excise Act, P.S. -Haidarganj, District- Ayodhya. (iv) Case Crime No.93 of 2023, under Section 3/5A/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and 11 of U.P. Prevention of Cruelty Act, P.S. - Haidarganj, District- Ayodhya. (v) Case Crime No.230 of 2023, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S.- Haidarganj, District- Ayodhya. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs.20,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. Order Date :- 12.3.2025 Anand/- Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench