VINITA @ REKHA D/O LATE SHRI SIYARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4262/2025 · 2025-04-02
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12822 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12822 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:14944] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4262/2025 Vinita @ Rekha D/o Late Shri Siyaram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Gali No. 1, Arab Road, Sirsaganj, District Firojabad (Uttar Pradesh) Present Rented At House No. E-54A, Chanakya Palace, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi (Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vipin Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 02/04/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.21/2015 registered at Police Station Cyber Crime, District Jaipur for the offences under Sections 420 & 120B of IPC and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act.
2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the present matter is of bail jump. Counsel submits that after marriage petitioner got pregnant and she could not appear before the learned trial Court and as such, her bail bonds were forfeited and she was called through arrest warrant. It is submitted that petitioner is in custody since 10.03.2025. Counsel submits that the petitioner undertakes to appear before the learned trial Court
[2025:RJ-JP:14944] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4262/2025] on each and every date as fixed by the trial Court. He thus, prays that the instant bail application may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by
learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Considering the overall facts & circumstances of the case and on the undertaking of the petitioner that henceforth the petitioner shall appear on each and every date as fixed by the trial court, I deem it proper to allow the bail application, subject to deposition of fine imposed by the learned trial Court under Section 446 of Cr.PC (Section 491 of BNSS).
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Vinita @ Rekha D/o Late Shri Siyaram shall be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /266