Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 128210 (ALL)

RAVINDRA SWAROOP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECTT. LKO AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/2800/2025 · 2025-03-20

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16051 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2800 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ravindra Swaroop Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Sectt. Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rakesh Pratap Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Sandeep Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party no.1 and Sri R.P. Singh, learned counsel for opposite parties no.2 & 3. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:- "1. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus by which this Hon'ble High Court may kindly be pleased to direct the opposite parties, especially opp. no.2 to paying the all post retired dues as pension, provident fund, insurance, gratuity etc, as per rule which is pending till date after the retirement of petitioner on 31.7.24, who was working as a permanent employee on the post of Senior Assistant at the office of Nagar Palika Parishad, Bahraich. 2. A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding to the respondents to pay the rest dues to the petitioner without making any further deduction." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.3 and this Court may direct opposite party no.3 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.3 i.e. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Bahraich taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 20.3.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench