Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12820 (JHR)

LALITA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/701/2025 · 2025-08-22

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:24875 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 701 of 2025 ------ Lalita Devi, aged about 74 years, Wife of Late Ram Nath Lal, Resident of Raj Colony, Gali No.3, PO & PS- Sasaram, District- Rohtash, Bihar. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Ms. Debashree Mukherjee, Father’s name not know to the petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Govt. of Jharkhand, At- Nepal House, PO & P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi- Jharkhand. 3. Shri. K. Srinivasan, Father’s name not know to the petitioner, The Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Govt. of Jharkhand, At- Project Bhawan, PO & PS.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Shri. Prashant Kumar, Father’s name not know to the petitioner, The Chief Engineer, Department of Water Resources, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at Doranda, PO & PS- Doranda, District, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Shri Ravi Khujur, Father’s name not know to the petitioner, The Executive Engineer, Rural Development Special Division, Palamau, At- Daltonganj, At – PO & PS- Daltongaj, District- Medininagar, Jharkhand. 6. Shri. Shashi Ranjan, Father’s name not know to the petitioner, the Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, at- Daltonganj, at PO & PS-Daltonganj, District- Medininagar, Jharkhand. 7. Shri. Chandra Mauli Singh, Father’s name not known to the petitioner, The Accountant General (A & E), Jharkhand, At Shyamli Colony, PO & PS- Doranda, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party(s) : Mr. Sunil Kr. Agarwal, Advocate ------ 04/ 22nd August,2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order dated 09.12.2024 passed in WP(S) No.6261 of 2024 has been complied with by passing a reasoned order. 2. Since the reasoned order has been passed in compliance of order dated 09.12.2024, no contempt is made out, thus, this contempt application is dropped with a liberty to the petitioner that if he is aggrieved, he can challenge the aforesaid order before appropriate forum. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Sandeep cp2