Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:24875 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 701 of 2025 ------ Lalita Devi, aged about 74 years, Wife of Late Ram Nath Lal, Resident of Raj Colony, Gali No.3, PO & PS- Sasaram, District- Rohtash, Bihar.
… … Petitioner(s) Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Ms. Debashree Mukherjee, Father’s name not know to the petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Govt. of Jharkhand, At- Nepal House, PO & P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi- Jharkhand.
3. Shri. K. Srinivasan, Father’s name not know to the petitioner, The Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Govt. of Jharkhand, At- Project Bhawan, PO & PS.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.
4. Shri. Prashant Kumar, Father’s name not know to the petitioner, The Chief Engineer, Department of Water Resources, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at Doranda, PO & PS- Doranda, District, Ranchi, Jharkhand.
5. Shri Ravi Khujur, Father’s name not know to the petitioner, The Executive Engineer, Rural Development Special Division, Palamau, At- Daltonganj, At – PO & PS- Daltongaj, District- Medininagar, Jharkhand.
6. Shri. Shashi Ranjan, Father’s name not know to the petitioner, the Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, at- Daltonganj, at PO & PS-Daltonganj, District- Medininagar, Jharkhand.
7. Shri. Chandra Mauli Singh, Father’s name not known to the petitioner, The Accountant General (A & E), Jharkhand, At Shyamli Colony, PO & PS- Doranda, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand.
… … Opposite Parties ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------
For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate
For the Opp. Party(s) : Mr. Sunil Kr. Agarwal, Advocate
------ 04/ 22nd August,2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order dated 09.12.2024 passed in WP(S) No.6261 of 2024 has been complied with by passing a reasoned order.
2.
Since the reasoned order has been passed in compliance of order dated 09.12.2024, no contempt is made out, thus, this contempt application is dropped with a liberty to the petitioner that if he is aggrieved, he can challenge the aforesaid order before appropriate forum.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) Sandeep cp2