1 2025:CGHC:28932 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 91 of 2017 1 - Panchamdas S/o Umenddas R/o Village Rogda Tahsil Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Kuvardas S/o Umenddas R/o Village Rogda Tahsil Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Kartikdas S/o Umenddas R/o Village Rogda Tahsil Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ramdas S/o Umenddas R/o Village Rogda Tahsil Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5 - Bhagmati S/o Umenddas R/o Village Rogda Tahsil Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 6 - Bhagwantin D/o Umenddas R/o Village Rogda Tahsil Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 7 - Bajarihin D/o Umenddas R/o Village Rogda Tahsil Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 8 - Kuvariya D/o Umenddas R/o Village Rogda Tahsil Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 9 - Mankuvar D/o Umenddas R/o Village Rogda Tahsil Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 10 - Sukritdas S/o Mohandas R/o Village Rogda Tahsil Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 11 - Sukhsagar Das S/o Mohandas R/o Village Rogda Tahsil Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - Dhandas S/o Ramdin Das Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Rogda Tahsil Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh , Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh , District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Appellant : None present. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 23/06/2025 1. Though this case has been restored twice, despite that even after repeated calls today also, neither appellant appeared nor represented by any counsel, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the misc. appeal for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the misc. appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge amit AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2025.07.03 10:51:04 +0530