Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15018 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2267 of 2025 Applicant :- Mohd Shahbaan @ Shaban Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Homes Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Chaudhary,Gaurav Choudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Kumar Verma learned A.G.A. for respondent State. Notices to respondent no.2 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order. This application has been filed assailing the impugned order dated 20.3.2024 passed by ACJM 1st Sitapur in Case No.6517 of 2021 filed under Section 12 of the D.V. Act as well as the appellate order dated 11.12.2024. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that before passing an order under section 12 of the D.V. Act, the Magistrate has to take into consideration the domestic incident report received from the protection officer or service provider, which is mandatory in this case. The order dated 20.3.2024 has been passed without complying the provisions of sub-section 1 of section 12 Domestic Violence Act. It is further submitted that the orders have been passed without considering the recall application as well as notices were not served to the applicant. So far as compliance of proviso to Section 12 D.V. Act which provides that before passing any order on such application, the Magistrate shall take into consideration any domestic incident report received by him from the Protection Officer or the service provider. Bombay High Court in the case of Manoj Harikisanji Changani vs. Prema Shrinivas Changani reported in 2012 SCC OnLine Bom 38 has held that court before entertaining any application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and passing any order, whatsoever, thereon, the Court is not bound to call for the report of the Protection Officer as regards the domestic violence, therefore, on this ground the petition cannot be entertained. So far as the second ground taken by the learned counsel for the appellant that learned court below has passed the impugned order dated 20.3.2024 without considering the recall application is concerned, the specific finding in paragraph 11 has been given by the appellate court in this regard. The alleged recall application was given by respondent no. 6 Arsalan, however, no one appeared to press that application. Learned court below has not passed the maintenance order against the opposite party no.6 even the appeal has not been filed by respondent no.6. The applicant in this case has not given any application for recall before the learned court below, therefore, he could not avail any benefit regarding the same. Lastly, the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that the notices were not served to the applicant is concerned, in this regard, in paragraph12 finding has been given by the learned appellate court that the registered notices were sent to Mohd. Sahban and others, which have been received as mentioned in the status report. The status report has been perused by the appellate court as well as learned court below and after deeming the service as sufficient, the impugned order has been passed. The relevant paragraphs 11 and 12 of the order dated 11.12.2024 are extracted below:- " अपपलकररर कक ववदरन अधधवकर कक ओर सक रकर पसरतर वकयर गयर हह वक ववपकप सस 06 अरसलरन कर एकपकपय ररकरल परररनरपत कर वनसरररण वकए वबनर हप एकपकपय आदकश वकयर गयर हह जज ववधध ववपरपर हह एवस आररज हजनक यजगय हह। इस ससबसध मम अवर नयरयरलय कक पतरवलप कर अवलजकन सक सपष हह वक ववपकप सस०-6 अरसलरन कक ओर सक अवर नयरयरलय मम एकपकपय ररकरल परररनरपत वदनरक 20.10.2022 कज पसरतर वकयर गयर रर और ववपकपसस०-6 अरसलरन अपपलररर मज० शहबरन कर सगर भरई हह धजससक यह रथय सरवबर हजरर हह वक अपपलररर कज अवर नयरयरलय कक पतरवलप कक करयरवरहप कर पपणर जरन रर और इसकक बरद भप अपपलररर मज० शहवरन अवर नयरयरलय कक पतरवलप मम हरधजर नहह आयर धजस कररण उसकज ववरद ररमपलर पयररप मरनरक हहए बरद कक करयरवरहप एकपकपय रप सक अगसरररर कक गयप हह। जहरस रक एकपकपय ररकरल परररनरपत कक वनसरररण कक वबनर आदकश परररर करनक कर रथय हह रज इस ससबसध मम यह उलकखनपय हह वक उक परररनरपत ववपकप सस० 6 अरसलरन कक ओर सक अवर नयरयरलय मम वदयर गयर रर लकवकन उक परररनरपत पर बल दकनक हकरत उपससरर नहप आयर। अवर नयरयरलय दररर उसकक ववरद भरण पजषण दकनक हकरत आदकश परररर नहह वकयर गयर हह और यह पसरतर अपपल ववपकप सस०-6 अरसलरन कक ओर सक यजधजर भप नहह कक गयप हह। अपपलकररर दररर एकपकपय आदकश कज ररकरल करनक हकरत अवर नयरयरलय मम कजई परररनरपत पतरतर नहह वकयर गयर। इस पकरर अपपलकररर कर उक रकर बलहपन हह और इसकर कजई लरभ अपपलकररर कज नहह वदयर जर सकरर हह। 12. अपपलकररर कक ववदरन अधधवकर कक ओर सक रकर पसरतर वकयर गयर हह वक ववदरन अधपनसर नयरयरलय नक अपपलकररर व उसकक घर वरलल कक ववरद वयवकगर ररमपलर न हजरक हहए एकपकपय करयरवरहप कक गयप जज ववधध ववपरपर हह। अवर नयरयरलय कक पतरवलप कक अवलजकन सक सपष हह वक अवर नयरयरलय कक पतरवलप पर ववपकपगण मज० शहबरन आवद कज पकवषर रधजसटरर नजवटस भकजप गयप रप धजसकक सटकटस ररपजटर पतरवलप पर करगज ससखयर 7 क/11 दरधखल हह धजसमक आइटम ररसपव हजनर असवकर हह उक आधररज पर हप अवर नयरयरलय दररर ववपकपगण पर नजवटस कक ररमपलर पयररप मरनरक हहए एकपकपय करयरवरहप अगसरररर कक गयप धजसमम कजई ततवट नहह हह। इस पकरर अपपलकररर कक ववदरन अधधवकर कर उक रकर भप बलहपन हह।" On due consideration to the submissions advanced and perusal of the record, I do not find any illegality in the order impugned. The application, begin devoid of merit, is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench