::1:: APHC010152152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 7772/2025 Between: Satti Anantha Lakshmi ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G L NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: The Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner for the following relief: “…to issue an appropriate writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in issuing pattadar passbooks in favour of the petitioners pertaining to lands admeasuring Ac.5.00 cents each ::2:: (total Ac.10.00 CENTS ) situated in SY.NO.195/2A of Gokavaram Village of PRATHIPADU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT DESPITE of respective FORM-6A Applications dated 17.02.2025 and 31.01.2025 made by the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, discriminatory and also in violation of principles of Natural justice apart from violation articles 14, 19 21 and 300-A guaranteed under constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 to act upon the form-6A application dated 17.02.2025 made by the petitioners and also by considering the recommendation of the 2ND respondent in Ref/Coordn/C5/RORE/18923/2022 dated 13.02.2025 and by following due process of law and to pass such other order or orders as it deems fit AND proper in the circumstances of the case...” 2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to consider the Form-6A applications/representations dated 17.02.2025 and 31.01.2025 of the Petitioners. 3. Learned Standing Counsel for Respondents readily agreed to consider the Form-6A applications/representations dated 17.02.2025 and 31.01.2025, if any pending with the authorities. 4. In view of the submission of the learned Standing Counsel for Respondents, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the ::3:: allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do no service to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioners himself requested to issue a direction to consider the Form-6A applications/representations dated 17.02.2025 and 31.01.2025, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. 5. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider the Form-6A applications/representations dated 17.02.2025 and 31.01.2025 of the Petitioners within three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by passing a speaking order. No costs. Consequently, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA,J Dt: 25.03.2025 klk 12019 (8) SCALE 544 ::4:: 138 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 7772 of 2025 25.03.2025 klk