ACHINTYA SRIVASTAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATIRAJ LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/2909/2025 · 2025-03-20
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128187 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 128187 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16171 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2909 of 2025 Petitioner :- Achintya Srivastav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayatiraj Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Maurya,Abhinav Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. Deepshikha, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the petition on merits, rather, he prays that respondent no. 2 be directed to decide his representation, as contained in Annexure No. 6 to the petition. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh representation to respondent no. 2 within two weeks from today and in case, such a representation is submitted within the stipulated period, the same shall be decided by respondent no. 2 within a further period of six weeks by passing a reasoned and speaking order. With the observation made herein-above, the petition is
disposed of.
Order Date :- 20.3.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench