PUSHPA DEVI v. UNION OF INDIA TH SECRETARY TO GOVT. GOVT. OF INDIA DEPTT OF AADHAR AND ANOTHER
WP(C)/3155/2025 · 2025-11-14
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12817 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12817 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 3155/2025
Date of pronouncement: 14.11.2025 Date of uploading : 17.11.2025.
Pushpa Devi, age 68 years W/o Chain Singh R/o Ward No. 3, Panthal Road Katra District Reasi (J & K)
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. G.S. Thakur, Advocate
v/s
1. Union of India Through its Secretary to Government Government of India Department of Aadhar (Unique Identification Authority of India) Bangla Sahib Road, Behind Kali Mandir, Gole Market New Delhi- 110001
2. Deputy Director General Unique Identification Authority of India Regional Office SCO 95-98, 2nd Floor, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER(ORAL)
1. By this petition, petitioner herein is seeking a direction upon the respondents to rectify the date of birth of the petitioner as 09.05.1957 instead of 11.04.1961 mentioned in the Unique Identification Aadhar Card Number 8105-1625-4434 so as to maintain the identity of the petitioner under Aadhar (Targeted Sr. No. 111
2
Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidized Benefits & Services) Act, 2016 maintained by the respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already made a representation on 25.06.2025, before respondent nos. 1 and 2, but the same has not been considered by the respondents till date.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would feel satisfied if the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25.06.2025, within a reasonable period of time.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to the proposition being made by Mr. G. S. Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25.06.2025 within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon them by passing a speaking order thereon.
6.
Disposed of.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 14.11.2025 Manik
Whether this order is speaking: yes/no Whether this order is reportable: yes/no