RINKU SINGH S/O GOVIND SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4332/2025 · 2025-05-01
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12816 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12816 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:18448] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4332/2025 Rinku Singh S/o Govind Singh, Aged about 32 Years, R/o Town- Kudgaon, Near Sapotra Bus Stand, Kudgaon, PS-Kudgaon, District-Karauli (Raj.) (Presently confined in District Jail at Karauli) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5437/2025 Shankar S/o Chhotulal, Aged about 33 Years, Resident of Ghata Pada, Lalsot, Tehsil, Lalsot, Police Station Lalsot, District-Dausa. (At present confined in District Jail, Karauli) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anupam Sharma Mr. Rajveer Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 01/05/2025
1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0022/2025 registered at Police Station-Kudgaon, District-Karauli for the offences under Sections 8/20 and 8/29 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned
[2025:RJ-JP:18448] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4332/2025] Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that recovered quantity of contraband is below the commercial quantity. Charge-sheet has been filed. The petitioners are behind the Bar since 21.02.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.
6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Rinku Singh S/o Govind Singh (2) Shankar S/o Chhotulal shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/8-9