[2025:RJ-JP:15519] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4081/2025 1. Varis S/o Hanif, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Bilond, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Raj.) 2. Osama S/o Kamru, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Lebda, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioners Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4217/2025 Mohammad Mustafa S/o Ismail, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Nandera, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Rajasthan). (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4218/2025 1. Akib S/o Miharu, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Shadi Ka Waas (Ragla Aramsingh), Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. 2. Arsad S/o Sourabh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Lebda, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4219/2025 1. Suraj S/o Charan Singh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Karmuka Bas, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg [2025:RJ-JP:15519] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4081/2025] (Rajasthan). 2. Kalam S/o Nura, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Digcholi, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Sharma Mr. Ankit Khandelwal Mr. Balram Vashisth Mr. Mohd. Rehan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Poonia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 07/04/2025 These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 116/2025 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 111(2)(a) and 61(2) BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act. Learned counsels for the petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The recovery of mobile phones, sim cards etc. have already been effected, the accused petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners. [2025:RJ-JP:15519] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4081/2025] Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes these bail applications and contended that the recovery of mobile phones, sim cards etc. have been effected from the possession of the accused-petitioners, therefore considering the allegations levelled against the accused-petitioners their bail applications deserves to be dismissed. Heard and perused the material available on record. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsels for the parties and looking to the fact that the offences alleged to have been committed by the accused-petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case will take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Accordingly, these bail application under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners 1. Varis S/o Hanif, 2. Osama S/o Kamru, 3. Mohammad Mustafa S/o Ismail, 4. Akib S/o Miharu, 5. Arsad S/o Sourabh, 6. Suraj S/o Charan Singh, 7. Kalam S/o Nura, in connection with FIR No. 116/2025 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /291-294