Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 128129 (PNJ)

SHIVAM KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/66285/2025 · 2025-11-28

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 217 Shivam Kumar State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Santosh Kumar, Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana \ VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of petitioner in case bearing FIR No. Section 3(5), 109(1), 308(4), 351(3), 238, 111(2,3,4), 61, 215 of the Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Station Shahabad, District Kurukshetra as to enable him to attend marriage of his brother-Sandeep, 2. Even though the aforesaid aspect has been verified by the police, however, it is informed that the petitioner is involved in 04 other cases registered in G robbery. The police has may abscond from the marriage and that even the local police has objection to the 3. Taking into consideration the circumsta that the marriage is fixed for tomorrow i.e. 29.11.2025 and the criminal antecedents of petitioner coupled with the fact that the presence of the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-66285 Date of decision: VERSUS Haryana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ r. Santosh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of petitioner in case bearing FIR No.221 dated 3(5), 109(1), 308(4), 351(3), 238, 111(2,3,4), 61, 215 of the Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25, 27, 54, 59 of Arms Act 1959 at Police Station Shahabad, District Kurukshetra as to enable him to attend marriage of Sandeep, which is to be solemnized on 29.11.2025 i.e. tomorrow. Even though the aforesaid aspect has been verified by the police, however, it is informed that the petitioner is involved in 04 other cases registered in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh including heinous offence robbery. The police has also conveyed its apprehension may abscond from the marriage and that even the local police has to the grant of interim bail to the petitioner. Taking into consideration the circumsta that the marriage is fixed for tomorrow i.e. 29.11.2025 and the criminal antecedents of petitioner coupled with the fact that the presence of the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 66285-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 28.11.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ or the petitioner. Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana. petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of interim bail to the dated 10.04.2025 registered under 3(5), 109(1), 308(4), 351(3), 238, 111(2,3,4), 61, 215 of the Bharatiya and Sections 25, 27, 54, 59 of Arms Act 1959 at Police Station Shahabad, District Kurukshetra as to enable him to attend marriage of to be solemnized on 29.11.2025 i.e. tomorrow. Even though the aforesaid aspect has been verified by the police, however, it is informed that the petitioner is involved in 04 other including heinous offence of apprehension that the petitioner may abscond from the marriage and that even the local police has raised an grant of interim bail to the petitioner. Taking into consideration the circumstances including the fact that the marriage is fixed for tomorrow i.e. 29.11.2025 and the criminal antecedents of petitioner coupled with the fact that the presence of the SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.12.02 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 217 CRM petitioner at the which the brother of the groom is required petition is dismissed 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 28.11.2025 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable CRM-M-66285-2025(O&M) marriage ceremonies is not essential as there is no ritual for which the brother of the groom is required dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 marriage ceremonies is not essential as there is no ritual for which the brother of the groom is required, consequently, the present Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.12.02 17:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document