Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12812 (RAJ)

NIKHIL TALWAR S/O SHRI SATISH TALWAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4147/2025 · 2025-07-03

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24358] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4147/2025 Nikhil Talwar S/o Shri Satish Talwar, Aged About 41 Years, R/o House No. 2/131 Malviye Nagar, Police Station Malviye Nagar, Jaipur, At Present R/o House No. 213, Royal Green Citi First, Bad Ke Balaji, Police Station Bagru, Jaipur (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Its PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena Mr. Vishal Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 03/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0124/2025 registered at Police Station-Jawahar Circle, District-Jaipur City (East) for offences under Sections 305(a) and 331(3) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The matter relates to the theft of Laptop and the charges levelled against the present petitioner are exclusively triable by a Magistrate. He further submits that though there are several cases pending against the present petitioner but most of the cases relates to same Police [2025:RJ-JP:24358] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4147/2025] Station. He again submits that the petitioner is behind the Bars since 03.03.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Nikhil Talwar S/o Shri Satish Talwar shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. 7. Further, the petitioner is directed to mark his presence fortnightly in every month before the SHO, Police Station-Bagru, Jaipur till conclusion of trial. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. [2025:RJ-JP:24358] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4147/2025] 9. If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the Court the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/75