Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 128113 (ALL)

ANANT RAM AND 6 OTHERS v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION HARDOI AND 14 OTHERS

WRIB/225/2025 · 2025-03-24

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16724 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 225 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anant Ram And 6 Others Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation Hardoi And 14 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Singh,Arvind Kumar Shukla,Santosh Kumar Ramakant Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arjun Prasad Mishra,Dilip Kumar Pandey,Sarvesh Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State/ opposite party Nos. 1 to 4, Shri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite party No.5 as well as Shri Sarvesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the Caveator and perused the record. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief:- "1. A writ order on direction in the nature of certiorari quashing order dated 14.09.2016 passed by O.P. No. 3, 18.11.2024 passed by O.P. No.- 2 and 15.02.2025 passed by O.P. No.- 1 contained in Annexure No. 3, 4 & 5 respectively and affirm order dated 23.11.2004 & 28.02.2007 contained in Annexure No.- 1 & 2. 2. A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties not to disturb Peaceful possession of the petitioners on their patta land." On being confronted, after taking note of the specific findings recorded by the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Hardoi/opposite party No.2 in the impugned order dated 18.11.2024, passed in Appeal/Case No.0651/2023, (Computerized Case No.202354103300000651 (Anantram and others Vs. Ram Ladaitey and others), under Section 9(B)(3) of the Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (in short "Act, 1953") as also by Deputy Director of Consolidation, Hardoi/opposite party No. 1 in the Revision/Case No. 1563/2023 (Computerized Case No.202454103300001563) (Anantram and others Vs. Ram Ladaitey and others) under Section 48(1) of the Act, 1953, according to which the Patta (s) for construction(s) of house was not provided to the petitioners, counsel for the petitioners says that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh with proper pleadings and documents in support thereof. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 24.3.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench