HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2410 of 2023 [Aongwith] APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8337 of 2023 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Since both the applications are arising out of a same case crime number, they are being decided by a common judgment. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Shivam Singh holding brief of Sri Sumit Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for opposite parties nos. 2 and 3 and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the material placed on record. By means of the instant application, the applicants have prayed for Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A., Alok Mishra, Manoj Kumari Tiwari, Sumit Kumar Srivastava Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ambrish Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home), Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Anchal Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt. Lko And Others .....Opposite Party(s) quashing of the chargesheet no. 01 of 2022, dated 18.10.2022 in Criminal Case No. 25612 of 2022; State Vs. Anchal Verma and another, arising out of Case Crime No. 0240 of 2022, under Sections 494, 406, 506, 507 IPC, Police Station Murtiha, District Bahraich and summoning order dated 15.12.2022 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, court no. 9, Bahraich, as well as entire proceedings in pursuance thereof, on the basis of compromise dated 27.09.2024. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the matter is arising out of a matrimonial dispute and with the consent of the parties, the matter was sent to Mediation & Conciliation Center of this Court vide order dated 25.04.2025, passed by this Court in Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. N. 2410 of 2023. Whereafter, the parties appeared before the Mediation & Conciliation Centre of this Court and have settled their dispute, while executing the settlement/agreement dated 27th of September, 2024. He submits that all the disputes have been settled in between the parties and there is no dispute further and, thus, further criminal proceeding is amount to harassment and abuse of process of the law. Thus, submission is that the criminal proceedings against the applicants may be quashed. Learned counsel appearing for opposite parties nos. 2 and 3 has also supported the version of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that parties have amicably settled their dispute and opposite parties nos. 2 and 3 have no grievance, hence, criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submissions aforesaid. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and particularly the report of the Mediators dated 30.09.2024, appended alongwith the settlement/agreement dated 27th of September, 2024, it is apparent that the parties have settled their dispute, after the matter was referred to the Mediation & Conciliation Centre of this Court vide order dated 25th of April, 2023 and the parties have settled their dispute through settlement/agreement. A482 No. 2410 of 2023 2 Resultantly, the criminal proceedings of Crl. Case No. 25612 of 2022; State Vs. Anchal Verma and another, arising out of Case Crime No. 0240 of 2022, under Sections 494, 406, 506, 507 IPC, Police Station Murtiha, District Bahraich, are hereby quashed. The compromise deed shall be part of this order. Consequences to be followed. The application is allowed accordingly. September 1, 2025 kkv/ A482 No. 2410 of 2023 3 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench