AKSHAYA KUMAR PANDA v. BANKING OMBUDSMAN, R.B.I., ODISHA, BBSR
WP(C)/2715/2025 · 2025-03-28
S K Panigrahi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12809 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12809 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.2715 of 2025
Akshaya Kumar Panda ..... Petitioner Mr. Jyotirmay Gupta,
Advocate -versus- Banking Ombusman, Reserve Bank of India & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. Devi Prasad Tripathy, Advocate
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. K. PANIGRAHI
Order No.
ORDER 28.03.2025
05.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2. In filing this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has sought for setting aside the closure order dated 16.12.2024 in Complaint Case No. 2020213000669 passed by the Opposite Party No.1 and refund of excess amount, which was deducted from his account.
3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and
learned counsel for the Opposite Parties/Bank.
4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner and on going through the averments made in this Writ Petition, this Writ Petition stands disposed of directing the Petitioner to approach the Opposite Parties/Bank by way of a representation
Page 2 of 2. offering the amount and request for OTS within a period of two weeks hence. In such event, the Opposite Parties/Bank shall do the needful for settlement of the amount on or before 10th April, 2025.
5. It is made clear that the Bank shall consider the matter in a conciliatory manner so that the dispute can be settled. The Petitioner shall also be given opportunity for pressing his case and also the documents regarding payment of his installments.
6. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Dr. S. K. Panigrahi)
Judge
Gitanjali