Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12809 (ORI)

AKSHAYA KUMAR PANDA v. BANKING OMBUDSMAN, R.B.I., ODISHA, BBSR

WP(C)/2715/2025 · 2025-03-28

S K Panigrahi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.2715 of 2025 Akshaya Kumar Panda ..... Petitioner Mr. Jyotirmay Gupta, Advocate -versus- Banking Ombusman, Reserve Bank of India & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. Devi Prasad Tripathy, Advocate CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. K. PANIGRAHI Order No. ORDER 28.03.2025 05. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. In filing this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has sought for setting aside the closure order dated 16.12.2024 in Complaint Case No. 2020213000669 passed by the Opposite Party No.1 and refund of excess amount, which was deducted from his account. 3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties/Bank. 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner and on going through the averments made in this Writ Petition, this Writ Petition stands disposed of directing the Petitioner to approach the Opposite Parties/Bank by way of a representation Page 2 of 2. offering the amount and request for OTS within a period of two weeks hence. In such event, the Opposite Parties/Bank shall do the needful for settlement of the amount on or before 10th April, 2025. 5. It is made clear that the Bank shall consider the matter in a conciliatory manner so that the dispute can be settled. The Petitioner shall also be given opportunity for pressing his case and also the documents regarding payment of his installments. 6. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Dr. S. K. Panigrahi) Judge Gitanjali