LAFASHAIL POWER AGENCY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
WP(C)/2997/2023 · 2025-09-01
Rajesh Mazumdar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12809 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12809 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010107592023
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2997/2023 LAFASHAIL POWER AGENCY REPRESENTED BY SRI MUJIBUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O LATE ABDUL ROUF CHOUDHURY, R/O VILL- SOUTH LAFASHAIL, P.O.-LAKSHMI BAZAR, DIST- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, POWER (ELECTRICITY) DEPARTMENT, A- BLOCK, 4TH FLOOR, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (COMMERCIAL) ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED CAR BIJULI BHAWAN 5TH FLOOR PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI-01 3:MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED BIJULI BHAWAN PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI-01 4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BADARPUR ELECTRICAL CIRCLE ASSAM POWER DISTIRBUTION COMPANY LIMITED CAR
Page No.# 2/3 BADARPUR P.O.-BADARPUR DIST-KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788710 5:ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER KARIMGANJ ELECTIRCAL DIVISION APDCL CAR KARIMGAN Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, MR. A S TAPADER,MR M AHMED,MR. M A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, APDCL,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
ORDER Date : 02-09-2025 Heard Mr. M.A Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Das, learned Standing counsel for the APDCL. It is submitted at bar that the subject matter of this writ petition are covered by the judgment & order dated 06.08.2025, 06.08.2025, 14.07.2025, passed in W.P.(C) No. 2894/2023, W.P.(C) No.2798/2023 & W.P.(C) No. 2875/2023. Both the parties had consented that this writ petition may be
disposed in terms of the directions given in those orders. Accordingly, the present writ petition also stands dismissed leaving the petitioner to avail such remedy as may be available to it in law, if so advised. Writ petition stands disposed of.
Page No.# 3/3
JUDGE Comparing Assistant