AHMED DIN v. B K SINGH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPTT AND OTHERS
CCP(S)/278/2021 · 2025-10-15
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12808 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12808 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 278/2021 In SWP No. 457/1999 CM No. 7357/2024
Ahmed Din
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
B K Singh Commissioner Secretary Education Department & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (15.10.2025)
The instant contempt petition arises out of an order/judgment dated 20.09.2000 passed by this Court, by virtue of which the writ petition preferred by the petitioner was disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner against the posts which have become available on account of some of the candidates who have not joined. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner perhaps for the reason that order/judgment sought to be enforced may have been implemented, as such, petitioner remain unrepresented.
Be that as it may, the instant contempt petition is disposed of and the proceedings are dropped, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival/restoration of the petition, in case, cause survives.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 15.10.2025 Renu
Serial No.193 Renu Bala 2025.10.16 13:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document