SMT. LEELAWATI v. ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE -IST, LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A227/1299/2025 · 2025-03-11
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127982 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127982 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14918 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1299 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Leelawati Respondent :- Addl. District Judge -Ist, Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sadhu Saran Shukla,Madhu Srivastava,Shashank Shukla Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging an interlocutory order, whereby the substitution application was allowed on a cost of Rs.300/-.
3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the fact with regard to death of the wife was duly disclosed in the written statement also. However, a false plea was taken that the information with regard to death was revealed for the first time in July, 2022 and an application for substitution was moved on
03.08.2022.
4. Considering the fact that the order impugned is an interlocutory order, I do not see any reason to interfere.
5. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the said order also when the matter is finally decided in accordance with law.
6. The petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench