APHC010151272020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9293/2020 Between: 1. THUTTIKA PUSHPA, W/O.RAMARAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEAR R/0 H.NO.13-3-34/1, MAIN ROAD, SAMALKOTA, EAST GODAVARI ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AT KAKINADA 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SAMALKOTA POLICE STATION, SAMALKOTA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SAMALKOTA POLICE STATION, SAMALKOTA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 5. KORAMANDLAVEERAVENKATASUBRAHMANYAM, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO, R/0 H.NO.13-3-34/1, MAIN ROAD, SAMALKOTA, EAST GODAVARI ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.4, being the Station House Office of respondent No.3 police station, in trying to interfere in civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.5 pending in civil court in Execution Petition No.104 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada, calling the petitioner and her husband to police station and insisting to settle the issue with respondent No.5 by withdrawing the said case, at the instance of respondent No.5, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondent No.4, being the Station House Office of respondent No.3 police station, not to interfere with civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.5 before civil 2 court in Execution Petition No.104 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada, in the interest of justice, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. E V V S RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “...to issue an appropriate order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.4, being the Station House Office of respondent No.3 police station, in trying to interfere in civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.5 pending in civil court in Execution Petition No.104 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada, calling the petitioner and her husband to police station and insisting to settle the issue with respondent No.5 by withdrawing the said case, at the instance of respondent No.5, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondent No.4, being the Station House Office of respondent No.3 police station, not to interfere with civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.5 before civil court in Execution Petition No.104 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada, in the interest of justice, and pass ...” Heard learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. None represented for the Petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions, would submit that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is purely civil in nature and respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties and would submit that appropriate orders may be passed by disposing of this Writ Petition. 3 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 9293 of 2020 12.09.2025 Mjl /*