BABU v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION DEPTT. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/2820/2025 · 2025-03-12
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127969 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127969 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15200 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2820 of 2025 Petitioner :- Babu Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Basic Education Deptt. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Singh Rana,Shambhu Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has sought direction to the respondents to continue on the post of Gardener-cum-Cleaner-cum-Guard.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that was initially appointed as contract worker on the post of Gardener- cum-Cleaner-cum-Guard, 10 years ago and since then he is continuously rendering his services at Lucknow DIET Center. It is submitted that during course of his duties, petitioner suffered heart attack and petitioner remained hospitalized for about six days and thereafter, petitioner was given two months leave by the Institution for his treatment.
4. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after becoming physically fit, the petitioner went to his Office for joining his duties, but the respondents refused to permit the petitioner to resume his duties. In this regard, the petitioner moved several representations before the respondents, but till date no orders have been passed.
5. After arguing the matter up to some length, it is submitted by
learned counsel for the petitioner that grievance of petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent no. 2 - Principal, District Institute of Education and Training, Nishatganj, Lucknow is directed to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 03.03.2025, annexed as Annexure - 3 to the writ petition, expeditiously.
6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection in case suitable directions are issued to respondent no. 2 to proceed to consider and decide petitioner's representation.
7. In view of above, present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 2 - Principal, District Institute of Education and Training, Nishatganj, Lucknow to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 03.03.2025, annexed as Annexure - 3 to the writ petition, expeditiously, say within six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this
order, in accordance with law by means of reasoned and speaking order and communicate the decision to the petitioner.
Order Date :- 12.3.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench