Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 127963 (ALL)

LENGAD @ KUTUBUDDIN AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/2264/2025 · 2025-03-11

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14919 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2264 of 2025 Applicant :- Lengad @ Kutubuddin And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Raman Mishra,Aradhana Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard Ms. Palavi Dwivedi, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Ashish Raman Mishra,learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. The present application has been filed by the applicants for the following main reliefs:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire proceedings of Case No - 5480 of 2020, State Versus Lengad and others, arising out from Case Crime No-0455 of 2019, Under Section - 323, 504, 506, 308 I.P.C., Police Station - Kotwali Nanpara, District - Bahraich, pending in the court of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (C.J.M.) Bahraich as well as impugned charge sheet dated 02/07/2019, submitted by the investigating officer in the aforesaid case crime number and impugned summoning order dated 06/06/2020 passed by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (C.J.M) Bahraich, in respect of Petitioners only, in the interest of law and justice.." After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicants to file bail application before the trial court which may be directed to be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116, and also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may also be directed to be decided expeditiously. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the Court concerned, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Liberty is also granted to the applicants to move discharge application before the court below, if the charges have not been framed, which shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicants apply for bail, whichever is earlier, they would not take any coercive action against the applicants in the aforesaid case. With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench