1 2025:CGHC:32549 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1921 of 2021 1 - Shivshakti Pharma Through Its Proprietor Vijay Kumar Thakur, S/o A. P. Thakur, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Sarju Bagicha, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Simar Enterprises Through Its Proprietor, Pawan Jeet Kukreja, S/o Paramjeet Singh Kukreja, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Shivaji Nagar, Telipara, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Honey Medicose Through Its Proprietor, Harendra Singh S/o Ramesh Singh, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Medical Complex, Shivaji Nagar, Telipara, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - R. Enterprises Through Its Proprietor Rakesh Kumar Sharma, S/o Late G. J. Sharma, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Imlipara, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Maruti Pharma Through Its Proprietor Vishal Goyal, S/o Madan Mohan Goyal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Medical Complex, Telipara, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary Cooperative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Registrar Firms And Societies, Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Assistant Registrar Firms And Societies, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Bilaspur District Chemist And Druggist Association Through Its Secretary, Chemist Bhawan, Medical Complex, Telipara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- 6 - Chief Election Officer District Chemist And Druggist Association, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Aparajita Pandey, Advocate holding the brief of Shri Harsh Wardhan, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, Addl. A.G. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 14.07.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous. 2. Taking into consideration the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi