Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12795 (UTT)

VISHAL DHIMAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/1109/2024 · 2025-06-16

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:4982 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 16th JUNE, 2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1109 OF 2024 Vishal Dhiman and Another ..... Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand and Another ..…Respondents Counsel for the Applicants : Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate. Counsel for the State : Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Brief Holder. Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, Advocate. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. The present Application has been filed by the applicants Vishal Dhiman and Jaipal Singh seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.190 of 2024, registered at Police Station Dalanwala, District Dehradun under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2. Heard Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General for the State and Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. 3. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General for the State submitted, on instruction, received from the investigating officer that the investigation has been completed and the 1 2025:UHC:4982 investigating officer has filed a closure report in the present matter. 4. After the said submission of Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General for the State, on the request of Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate, for the applicants, the present anticipatory bail application is disposed of accordingly. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Date:16.06.2025 Pant/ 2