[2025:RJ-JP:14106] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4134/2025 Idu Kha S/o Shri Fateh Singh, R/o D-365 Surya Nagar, Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4135/2025 Kallu Kha S/o Deenu Kha, R/o Village Bahala Police Station Bagad Tiraya, Alwar (At Present Confined In District Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena Mr. Sanjay Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Manish Kumar, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/03/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.33/2025 registered at Police Station Bagad Tiraya, District Alwar for the offences under Sections 140(3), 115(2), 127(2), 308(2) & 351(3) of BNS. Investigation is being conducted for offences punishable under Sections 140(2), 115(2), 127(2), 308(5), 351(3) & 61(2)(a) read with Section 3(5) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:14106] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4134/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that false case has been instituted against the petitioners. It is submitted that FIR has been lodged with delay of four days. Learned counsel contend that now, dispute has been resolved by the parties amicably. It is contended that petitioners have no criminal antecedents and they are in custody since their date of arrest. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise and he has no objection if these bail applications are accepted. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also considering the fact that dispute has been resolved by the parties amicably; petitioners have no criminal antecedents; trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 7. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (1) Idu Kha S/o Shri Fateh Singh, & (2) Kallu Kha S/o Deenu Kha, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two [2025:RJ-JP:14106] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4134/2025] sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /243-244