RANJIT DAS ALIAS RANJIT SEXENA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6978/2025 · 2025-09-18
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12795 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12795 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:28716 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 6978 of 2025
Ranjit Das @ Ranjit Sexena, aged about 30 years, son of Ghutan Das, resident of village Ghangor, P.O. Devsangh, P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand ---
--- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
---
--- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
---
For the Petitioner: Mr. Himanshu S. Pandey, Advocate
For the O.P-State: Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, A.P.P.
--- 03 / 18.09.2025 Heard the parties.
2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 34 of 2025 arising out of Hansdiha P.S. Case No. 71 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 14 of 2025 for the offences registered under sections 310(2) and 317 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Dumka.
3. On 08.08.2024, dacoity was committed in Hansdiha Branch of Indian Bank. Unknown dacoits looted Rs. 18,96,565/- from there.
4. It was submitted that the petitioner is neither named in the FIR, nor he was put on T.I. Parade. It was submitted that Rs. 13,300/- is alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, which belongs to the petitioner.
5. Learned A.P.P has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner is accused in as many as four cases relating to dacoity, robbery and Arms Act.
6. Considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected.
(Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded