RAM UJAGAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/2781/2025 · 2025-03-11
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127935 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127935 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14843 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2781 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Ujagar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharvan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Sharvan Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was working on the post of Home Guard and submits that respondents are going to superannuate the petitioner on 31.10.2025, treating his date of birth to be
01.10.1965. 3. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has given is date of birth as 01.08.1967 at the time of his induction in service and even in his educational certificates petitioner's date of birth has been indicated as 01.08.1967 and accordingly has prayed for direction to the respondents to correct the date of birth of petitioner in his service records. 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand has opposed the writ petition. He, on the basis of instructions has submitted that the petitioner at the time of his induction in service had declared his date of birth as 01.10.1965 and even provided documents on the basis of which his date of birth has been recorded in his service record, and there is no requirement for any change in the same. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter up to some length has submitted that grievance of petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent no. 5 - District Commandant, Home Guard, Shravasti is directed to consider and decide his representation dated 30.05.2024, annexed as Annexure - 3 to the writ petition, expeditiously. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection in case suitable directions are issued to respondent no. 5 to consider and decide petitioner's representation. 7. In view of above, present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.
5 - District Commandant, Home Guard, Shravasti to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 30.05.2024, annexed as Annexure - 3 to the writ petition, expeditiously, say within six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order by means of reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioner. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench