RAKSHA RAM AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/2242/2025 · 2025-03-11
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127933 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 127933 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14875 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2242 of 2025 Applicant :- Raksha Ram And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gyanendra Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Adarsh Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Shri Adarsh Kumar Tripathi, learned Advocate who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 2 along with counter affidavit which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that compromise was entered between the parties and vide order dated 12.08.2024 both the parties were directed to appear before the concerned court/trial court for verification of the compromise deed which is on record as Annexure No. 4 to the petition. In compliance of the order dated 12.08.2024, on 18.09.2024 the petitioners as well as respondent no. 2 were present before the Sessions Judge, Shrawasti and in their presence the compromise has been verified by him. The order whereby the compromise has been verified, is on record as Annexure No. 5 to the petition.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that since the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court by entering into compromise and the said compromise has been verified under the order of the Court, hence, in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab" reported in "(2012) 10 SCC 303", the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to this prayer.
In view of the above and considering the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab" reported in "(2012) 10 SCC 303", "Hitesh Verma v. State of Uttarakhand, (2020) 10 SCC 710" and "Ishwar Pratap Singh v. State of U.P., (2018) 13 SCC 612" and
"Narinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 466", as well as the fact that the compromise entered between the parties has been verified vide
order dated 18.09.2024 by Sessions Judge, Shrawasti, the proceedings of ST No. 11/2016, "Munshi Ram Vs. Raksha Ram and Others" arising out of complaint case No. 372/2014 , under Sections 147/323/504/506/395/452 IPC, P.S. Sonwa, District Shrawati pending before the Sessions Judge, Shrawasti are hereby quashed. The petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 11.3.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench