Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 127922 (ALL)

SMT. DURGAWATI PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. ENERGY LKO AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/2506/2025 · 2025-03-24

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16604-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2506 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Durgawati Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohitash Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Aprajita Bansal Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard Shri Rohitash Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner disputes the electricity bill as referred in the relief clause. 3. He should approach the Executive Engineer concerned who is the opposite party no. 3 under Clause 6.5 of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005 who may look into the matter and do the needful as per law but with expedition, say, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 24.3.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench